Archives For Web

At every available opportunity, I partake in airborne WiFi services. Yeah, I know public wireless isn’t the most secure form of connectivity. But, at the same time, I haven’t been bothered to set up a personal tunnel. And I’ll do just about anything to pass the time on a cross country flight… as I did when returning from CES last week. Southwest’s wireless service runs a mere $5 during testing and linking up on my LAS>BWI flight (3140, 1/8) was a no brainer – especially as I hadn’t loaded up my iPhone with content and my Kindle was left at home.

Unfortunately, there’s something not quite right with their Internet connection in relation to Twitter. As you can see, I wasn’t the only one in my account:

southwest-twitter2

The interloper acted in the same manner I would have. Not entirely benign, but mostly benevolent as far as I can tell by merely firing off that lone alert. I’m not so concerned about anything in my archived Twitter direct messages, as it’s mostly boring stuff. I operate under the assumption that everything/anything online can become public at any time. Internet privacy is an easily shattered illusion.

Now it’s possible this person swiped my credentials off the network using something like Firesheep. But I’d expect a person dabbling in such affairs to more proudly proclaim I’d been p0wned. Followed by additional mayhem. So I’m taking him/her at face value and suspect somehow the packets were unintentionally crossed. And at the time there was super high latency on the network. Combined with Southwest’s proxy and framing of every web page (see below, left), I guess anything is possible. Although it shouldn’t be.

At the time of discovery, two hours after the fact, I was obviously startled and the only action I came up with was to delete the tweet. In retrospect, I should have left it be so as to not impact any possible forensic research. And to provide a more compelling post. But the screen grab will have to suffice. Once I deplaned, I changed my unique Twitter password, as a precaution, via aircard.

So consider this post a public WiFi PSA in addition to a security vulnerability notification to Southwest and Twitter. I’ll provide updates if either of them choose to respond.

(Thanks for alerting me, Steve!)

During my brief visit to the Engadget trailer at CES, Jacob Schulman suggested I track down the Snapstick box. Unfortunately I never managed to find the company, so we’re swiping his hard work instead.

Snapstick is currently a prototype set-top device, although a deal’s been inked with D-Link, designed to channel web content onto one’s television. Like countless others. But Snapstick takes a somewhat novel, if currently kludgy, approach by running a stripped down, custom version of Ubuntu to be accompanied by a VLC client for remote control. In English, the small box is basically a Linux computer that’s operated via iOS screensharing: Browse a web page on your iPad, launch the embedded video fullscreen on your TV. Snapstick’s OS and apps are also tricked it out with some dedicated hooks and a Firefox extension as well. But to get a full sense of how this device operates, you should hit Jacob’s video at Engadget. (And that “snap” motion to launch content onto the screen will surely lead to the destruction of many pricey devices… How about an icon or gesture instead?)

Because Snapstick is a full-on computer, with a presumably legit desktop browser user agent string, it’s less likely content providers will have a means of blocking web video as they do with Google TV. (Which Google doesn’t fight…)

Sounds like Snapstick is heading into beta testing shortly and they hope to launch for under $200 in the near future.

Click to enlarge:

Smart TVs are making a lot of the headlines this week, but a company called MultiTouch has a different genre of screens on display, and they are wicked cool. The MultiTouch Displays are similar to the Microsoft Surface technology that was all the rage a few years back, and to the HP TouchSmart product that Dave got a chance to play with at CES 2009. However, the displays from MultiTouch are modular, meaning you can connect multiple screens together; they’ve been implemented all over the world in tables and walls; and the platform is open so developers can create their own applications for the touchscreen interface. And oh, what a touchscreen interface it is.

The applications on display in the MultiTouch booth include a Twitter wall, a photo table, and a table application that was created for Dom Perignon with interactive champagne bubbles, a customized menu, and even table games. The company says it also has the technology deployed in medical, military, museum, and university environments, among others. The screens support an unlimited number of touch points from fingertips, to 2D markers, to household objects like coins. And because the platform is open, the possible applications are virtually limitless.

At CES, MultiTouch has announced the next-gen version of its platform and dubbed the technology MultiTaction.  The resulting displays are thinner, and scalable for screens ranging from “32 to 100 inches and beyond.” The company also says it will be ready to ship for the consumer market no later than Q3 of this year. The displays aren’t cheap, but at $4,000 a pop, they’re not out of reach for a certain slice of the population. And that’s the price this year. Surely eventually mass production will drive the price down further. Continue Reading…

The big TV manufacturers are all pushing 3D very hard, consumer sentiment be damned. But they’re also all getting on board with their own smart TV offerings, including services with app stores, and content that can be place-shifted to different devices. Yesterday Samsung and Panasonic both showed off their own TV app markets: Media Hub for Samsung, and Viera Connect for Panasonic. Samsung is touting TV episodes that can be accessed from mobile Galaxy devices, as well as an app ecosystem that it’s currently building out with developers. Panasonic showcased apps for Hulu Plus, MLB, BodyMedia, Skype, Facebook, Twitter, Withings, and Ustream during its event.

As the TV manufacturers jump into the app space, how will it change the landscape for both pay-TV operators and over-the-top box companies? (Not to mention the likes of Yahoo…) It will be interesting to watch.

I don’t know what it is about Yahoo, but every year at CES, one of us here at ZNF seems to get sucked in by the promise of Yahoo’s TV platform. In 2011, everybody and their mother is touting a smart TV or a web-connected TV box. Yahoo has been having this conversation for years, and despite little buzz, it seems to keep chugging along. New this year is a technology called “broadcast interactivity,” which shows up as a smart bar at the bottom of your screen and pastes content on top of broadcast and on-demand shows based on audio signatures it “hears” in the programming you watch. The smart bar includes content like TV trivia, polls, and links to buy stuff you see on the screen with your TV remote. (Jennifer Aniston’s sweater, anyone?) You can get the widget on any Yahoo-supported TV, or by connecting an upcoming retail D-Link box to your non-web-based TV screen. Yahoo is working directly with broadcasters to generate the content, with partners right now including ABC, CBS, Showtime, and the Home Shopping Network.

Now wait, I can hear you scoffing at this obvious move by networks to shove more marketing in front of us. But before you do, consider a few things. First, kids will go mad for this. A chance to interact with content around Barbie, iCarly, or whatever the latest craze is? I know my five-year-old would eat it up. Second, think about MTV pop-up videos or American Idol polls that let you text in your votes. People love’em. Third, do not underestimate the power of home shopping. The masses throng to it.

Most interesting to me is the fact that Yahoo is working on a solution that will appeal to consumers, with content closely tied to the programming people want to watch, and to content providers, who have major financial incentive to get something like this working. Yahoo is also working deals with advertisers (Ford, Microsoft, Mattel) to generate enhanced/interactive commercials. Looks like an interesting route around EBIF to me. Continue Reading…