Archives For TV Shows

As much as people like to hold Netflix up as a competitor to cable TV, the truth is it’s much more akin to HBO in both value and price. The one big difference between the two is HBO’s steadfast determination to tie its distribution to cable subscription packages. On that front, the company got another boost today with the official launch of the HBO Go and MAX Go (Cinemax) apps for Charter subscribers. These Internet apps mean authenticated users can get HBO and Cinemax shows virtually anywhere. And with Charter on board now, the only big players without mobile HBO on the docket are Cablevision and Time Warner Cable.

HBO is following in ESPN’s footsteps, proving that good content can dictate carriage in the online world as much as it can in the traditional pay-TV space. However, the more HBO expands its online content, the more it sets itself up as a direct rival to Netflix. Both are roughly the same price, and offer a mix of great content along with some middling stuff. HBO distinguishes itself in the original content domain, but even there, Netflix is looking to make its own waves. So the question becomes, are people more likely to pay for something separate from cable, or for a bundled cable add-on? And if we want both, just how high do we think we can we stretch the monthly entertainment budget?

Orb Networks has launched a new streaming app for the iPhone and Android devices designed to shift content from web TV sources like Hulu and ESPN3 to your smartphone. Sound familiar? Orb isn’t the only company running down this path. Fanhattan launched a TV content aggregation app last month, and TV Everywhere services, like the Xfinity app from Comcast, are also bringing TV from multiple sources to mobile phones and tablets. The difference with Orb is that it uses media server software on your PC to placeshift streams rather than beaming them directly from the Internet. The Orbcaster approach has its negatives, but on the positive side, Orb Live, like PlayOn, makes some content available that isn’t otherwise accessible on mobile devices – content like the free, ad-supported Hulu service, for one. Our friends at Mobiputing have gone hands on with the service (above).

The new Orb Live app is priced at $9.99, with the iPhone version available today and an Android app set to debut in August.

There was a lot of hype leading up to Microsoft’s keynote at the E3 conference earlier this week, with huge speculation that the company would launch a new live TV service on the Xbox. The announcement itself, however, was a bit of a let-down, at least for those of us in the US. After years of trying to get into the TV game, Microsoft’s latest foray involves live TV as an Xbox app. Sounds great, except the service is only scheduled to launch in the US “by the end of 2012,” and no major broadcast partners have been announced yet. Given how long it took Microsoft to add the Xbox as a U-verse set-top option with the AT&T service, I’m not holding my breath for a speedy deployment.

From Engadget’s coverage of the keynote, it looks like Microsoft has already worked out its guide software and DVR menus for Xbox TV. Execs also announced a new YouTube channel on Xbox Live, and there are hints (see photo above) that Microsoft is making headway with ABC. ESPN content is already in place, so that’s perhaps not a surprising development.

Dave and I sat down with a Microsoft rep back at CES when rumors of an Xbox live TV offering in the US were already making the rounds. And Microsoft has had live BSkyB TV on the Xbox in the UK since 2009. (Thanks, Lawler) It’s certainly progress, but other players are now pursuing the same over-the-top holy grail. Verizon theorized about FiOS as an app back in January, Comcast has said it will bring live TV to iPads later this year, and Time Warner launched a live TV app for the iPad back in March, with Cablevision following suit in April. Microsoft could have been a front-runner years ago with its Xbox-as-trojan-horse. In 2011, it’s just another player at the web TV party.

Yesterday at the D9 conference a new player entered the content discovery market. Fanhattan debuted an iPad app for finding TV shows and movie titles online. Reminiscent of the old Comcast Fancast site (now Xfinity-branded of course), Fanhattan shows you where to find the videos you want so you don’t have to go trolling around the net searching Netflix, iTunes, Hulu, etc. It’s competing against several other content discovery engines - Clicker, GetGlue, Miso and more – but Fanhattan’s focus isn’t as heavily centered on social sharing as its established counterparts. In my opinion, that’s a strength for the new app. You can get social if you want, but if you just want to watch TV, you can do that too.

There are nine basic modules for TV and movie selections: watch now options, episode details, reviews, cast and crew info, video clips (if available) soundtrack details, fan gear, connect options (Facebook or email sharing), and similar content. You get to this information by tapping through to either the TV or movie main menu and then browsing or searching through different categories. Filter selections include the ability to browse by user ratings, top picks, release dates, and much more. You can also search for titles by keyword.

The Fanhattan interface is quite visual, and, being an iPad app, entirely powered by taps and swipes. I have a few nitpicks about the design, but overall it’s very effective. Continue Reading…

In a research report released by SNL Kagan this week (hat tip to Multichannel News), new numbers show just how high retransmission fees are rising for cable, telco, and satellite TV operators. According to the Kagan report, operators paid $1.14 billion in retrans fees in 2010, with that number projected to rise to $1.46 billion in 2011, and to $3.61 billion by 2017.

No wonder industry folks are so touchy about Netflix getting content on the cheap.

Increasingly, licensing deals look to be a large part of the revenue strategy for TV networks. I haven’t seen anyone draw a line specifically between that strategy and the reduced effectiveness of television advertising, but I can only assume that the two aren’t unrelated. Sure, ad revenue is still predicted to rise through 2014, but nobody is underestimating anymore the disruptive power of the Internet and new business models for television delivery. With audience attentions fragmenting, broadcasters want a more predictable and reliable stream of revenue.

Meanwhile, as retrans fees rise, and the fights among content distributors get nastier, the government is readying itself to weigh in on the matter. The FCC issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) on retransmission consent earlier this year, and has begun to collect comments from industry players. Cablevision has filed comments already, proposing that the FCC: forbid must-carry rules around secondary broadcast channels, require transparency from broadcasters on retrans fees, and forbid practices that allow broadcasters to set different prices for service providers based on “size or other factors.”

Transparency in retransmission deals? Yeah, good luck with that.