Archives For Industry

The Content Wars

Mari Silbey —  December 6, 2006 — 1 Comment
spaceballs.jpg

Want to know how cable and telecom operators are going to compete in the short-term? One word: content.

Verizon has put a few notches in its lipstick case with recent sports content deals. Exhibit:

1. FiOS TV Signs the NFL Network
I’ve been skeptical of the NFL Network, but it does carry a few critical games that aren’t otherwise available in certain markets. There’s been a big brouhaha over this in both San Antonio and Washington DC, where the regional cable operators will be depriving fans of a Dallas-Atlanta game and a Ravens-Bengals game respectively. (Verizon kindly posts a cable v. FiOS comparison on the matter on its new blog…)

2. NFL Online
Starting December 7th, Verizon will offer “live NFL Network sports and entertainment programmingâ€? online to its broadband customers.

3. Verizon Gets Comcast SportsNet (?!)
Presumably in a move to appear anti-monopolistic, Comcast has given Verizon the right to carry Comcast SportsNet on its FiOS TV service. This is a big deal for Verizon because some customers might not consider a switch to FiOS if they couldn’t watch local games shown only on Comcast SportsNet.

So Verizon’s doing well in the sports department. But don’t think that cable operators are sitting idly by. Comcast, for example, has signed a deal for extensive VOD content from Disney, including popular ABC shows. The content wars are just beginning.

kool-aid-man.jpg

PVRBlog: Here’s the rumor: Apple will be licensing TiVo patented technology for iTV. Last summer TiVo was hiring Mac programmers, but I figured that was just for TiVo Desktop support. People won’t pay a couple hundred bucks just to have a device that plays iTunes Store purchases on their TV — it has to do other stuff, but will it be TiVo recording TV for you? I’d wager it’s got about a 25% chance of being true but hey, I’d love to be wrong on it and see what launches next month at Macworld SF.

Davis Freeberg: While this is only in phase one rumor status right now, it certainly would make a lot of sense and could benefit both companies. If this rumor does turn out to be true, it would certainly create a lot of buzz for the product. Few brands carry as dedicated a fanbase as Apple or TiVo and by combining their technologies, it would undoubtably create an internet superpower when it came to the coverage. While we’ll likely need to wait until Macworld to find out if there is any truth behind this, if it turns out to be true, it would certainly represent a key breakthrough for TiVo and would create a compelling reason for people to use their standalone DMR product over the generic cable boxes.

TiVo Community: This could make some sense though. I have said all along that Apple has no desire to be in the DVR business as they would rather open up more business for the iTunes download business model with the iTV. So why not just contract to someone with obvious expertise in DVRs to add that function and let the Apple developers stick to their core competence as well, which includes making and selling the hardware.

Dave: Hahahohohoheheha. No. Not gonna happen. 0% chance Apple’s iTV sports a TiVo interface. In the unlikely scenario of iTV venturing into DVR functionality, it’s entirely possible Apple would license various TiVo time shifting related patents to avoid the mess Echostar finds themselves in. But no TiVo interface. Never. At this point, Apple does not need higher profile technology partners… why dilute their own brand?

Financial analysis isn’t something I’m prepared to tackle publicly, so I’ve brought in some muscle for a multi-part series on TiVo’s numbers. Obviously this is speculative in nature and just one stockholder’s interpretation of the limited information TiVo chooses to disclose. Your mileage may vary. -DZ

In Part 1, we gave a value of TiVo’s existing subscriber base. But things are changing at TiVo: lifetime subscriptions are no longer available, and new subscribers can get free hardware, though they pay more in service fees. We need to know how this affects the value of new subscribers and how much TiVo should spend to acquire them.

To examine these issues, we will look at the Net Present Value (NPV) of subscribers, and the Return On Investment (ROI) in acquiring them (actually, instead of ROI, we’ll use MIRR, the Modified Internal Rate of Return). For the purposes of these calculations, we will use a 12% annual (1% per month) cash discount rate, as we did in Part 1. We will also use 12% as the finance rate for MIRR and 6% (0.5% per month) as the reinvestment rate (i.e., the return TiVo can obtain on short-term investments). As in Part 1, we will use 1% per month for subscriber churn, yielding an average sub life of 69 months. In this analysis, however, increasing the predicted churn rate will tend to reinforce our conclusions. Again, keep in mind that in this analysis, we are looking at value of bringing new subscribers on board, whereas in Part 1, we looked at the current value of existing subscribers.

Continue Reading…

Financial analysis isn’t something I’m prepared to tackle publicly, so I’ve brought in some muscle for a multi-part series on TiVo’s numbers. Obviously this is speculative in nature and just one stockholder’s interpretation of the limited information TiVo chooses to disclose. Your mileage may vary. -DZ

TiVo is an enigmatic company. While management peppers us with regular press releases hyping their latest deal or newest technology, it rarely provides the kind of information investors need to put a value on anything –- be it a new advertising relationship, distribution deal, or their own financial statements. This is the first article in a multi-part series in which we will engage in a bit of 8-K and 10-Q exegesis in an effort to understand what is really going on at TiVo. In this first installment, we will take a look at the value of TiVo’s subscribers (something CFO Steve Sordello specifically declined to do in the 3Q results call), and find some interesting details along the way.

To find the value of a sub, we’ll need a few pieces of information: how long does a TiVo subscriber remain a subscriber, how much does he pay, how much advertising revenue does he produce? Note that through most of this discussion we are referring to “TiVo-owned” subscribers, and not considering TiVo’s DirecTV subs as they have an economy all their own.

TiVo’s churn hangs around in the 0.9% to 1.0% range, but let’s use 1.0% since it is the most recent number we have. To find the lifetime of the average subscriber, we want to know how many months go by before half of a given body of subscribers has churned away. That is, we need to solve the equation:

  • 0.5 = (.99)N

The result is that the average subscriber lasts about 69 months. (This is actually quite a spectacular result. Consider that DirecTV’s churn is 1.8%, giving them an average sub lifetime of only 38 months.)

Continue Reading…

Let the Sun Shine

Mari Silbey —  December 4, 2006 — Leave a comment

I’ve seen a lot out of Sun recently, and I’m not sure if I’m simply more attuned to it, or if the company is trying to up its profile. First there was the woman I met at DEMOfall from Sun who talked about her team of colleagues walking the show promoting Java. Then there was reading about Sun CEO Jonathan Schwartz’s blog. (It’s been around since 2004 – where have I been?) Then there was Sun’s big announcement in November about the official Open Sourcing of Java. And now there’s The Big Mashup.

Sun sent out a press release last week on its new “unique online experience” that’s supposed to show how Internet technologies are converging online and creating a “Participation Age.” This is a wagon that many companies are trying to hitch their carts to – the concept of convergence, new ways for people to interact and be entertained, etc. Sun’s Mashup sounds like a reasonably good idea, but its goals are nebulous at best, and currently the execution is seriously lacking.

If the Big Mashup is meant to be a participatory, multimedia form, it’s got a ways to go. The press release talks about a documentary, which is really a 12-minute video montage speaking at a very introductory level about new technology tools for user-generated media. The release also talks about a community blog, which I did not see anywhere. Instead there were individual blogs from industry notables, several of which linked to other sites, and some of which had very limited content.

Finally, Sun touted something called Snapp Radio, which brings together online music and Flickr images. (Everyone’s integrating Flickr…) A cool idea, but it requires registration with online music sites, and it appears to me to be more of a novelty than anything else.

So The Big Mashup isn’t much to look at, or listen to today. But it’s interesting to watch Sun forage into the great wide world of convergence communications. Is it purely marketing shtick, or will we see more out of Sun in the way of consumer-facing, media convergence efforts?