<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Installing Google Chrome OS as a Virtual Machine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-11/installing-google-chrome-os-as-a-virtual-machine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-11/installing-google-chrome-os-as-a-virtual-machine/</link>
	<description>All your digital media goodness.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:09:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jon frederick</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-11/installing-google-chrome-os-as-a-virtual-machine/comment-page-1/#comment-91026</link>
		<dc:creator>jon frederick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/?p=13585#comment-91026</guid>
		<description>ha, its like citrix is rising from the dead...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ha, its like citrix is rising from the dead&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Barnard</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-11/installing-google-chrome-os-as-a-virtual-machine/comment-page-1/#comment-91025</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Barnard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/?p=13585#comment-91025</guid>
		<description>&quot;...It’s also a bit puzzling that Google would simultaneously pursue two distinct mobile operating systems.&quot;

Its inaccurate to call the Chrome OS a &quot;mobile&quot; operating system or compare it to Android, as much as calling the latest build Mac OS X Leopard 10.5 &quot;mobile&quot; against the iPhone.

The big division is 1) Form factor; where Android is for handsets and MIDs, and Chrome OS is for QWERTY netbooks 2) Connectivity; Android has a radio stack, Chrome doesn&#039;t.

In the short term ( next five years ) phones and netbooks will remain distinct, but yes, ultimately the lines will get very blurry.

Looking ahead to when personal computing is completely ubiquitous and Redfly-esque terminals are everywhere, like public payphones used to be, ChromeOS will find itself well positioned.

Sit down at any library, restaurant, coffee shop, or wherever you&#039;ve chosen to work at, and the surface style table prompt you with Chrome OS sign-in. After signing in all your preferences appear, your cloud storage is available, your social graph&#039;s activities pop up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;It’s also a bit puzzling that Google would simultaneously pursue two distinct mobile operating systems.&#8221;</p>
<p>Its inaccurate to call the Chrome OS a &#8220;mobile&#8221; operating system or compare it to Android, as much as calling the latest build Mac OS X Leopard 10.5 &#8220;mobile&#8221; against the iPhone.</p>
<p>The big division is 1) Form factor; where Android is for handsets and MIDs, and Chrome OS is for QWERTY netbooks 2) Connectivity; Android has a radio stack, Chrome doesn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>In the short term ( next five years ) phones and netbooks will remain distinct, but yes, ultimately the lines will get very blurry.</p>
<p>Looking ahead to when personal computing is completely ubiquitous and Redfly-esque terminals are everywhere, like public payphones used to be, ChromeOS will find itself well positioned.</p>
<p>Sit down at any library, restaurant, coffee shop, or wherever you&#8217;ve chosen to work at, and the surface style table prompt you with Chrome OS sign-in. After signing in all your preferences appear, your cloud storage is available, your social graph&#8217;s activities pop up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Zatz</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-11/installing-google-chrome-os-as-a-virtual-machine/comment-page-1/#comment-91023</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Zatz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/?p=13585#comment-91023</guid>
		<description>Forgot to mention... Google&#039;s Chrome OS looks exactly like what Arrington had envisioned for his &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-11/where-is-arringtons-crunchpad/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;delayed or dead CrunchPad tablet&lt;/a&gt;: a barebones, browser-based OS.

And... A Google OS has mainstream brand appeal/recognition in a way &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/download-netbook&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ubuntu Netbook Remix&lt;/a&gt; never will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgot to mention&#8230; Google&#8217;s Chrome OS looks exactly like what Arrington had envisioned for his <a href="http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-11/where-is-arringtons-crunchpad/" rel="nofollow">delayed or dead CrunchPad tablet</a>: a barebones, browser-based OS.</p>
<p>And&#8230; A Google OS has mainstream brand appeal/recognition in a way <a href="http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/download-netbook" rel="nofollow">Ubuntu Netbook Remix</a> never will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

