<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Windows 7 Codec Support Rumblings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-03/new-windows-7-codec-support-rumblings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-03/new-windows-7-codec-support-rumblings/</link>
	<description>All your digital media goodness.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:09:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dale Dietrich</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-03/new-windows-7-codec-support-rumblings/comment-page-1/#comment-87099</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale Dietrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/?p=8640#comment-87099</guid>
		<description>I installed win7codecs on my Windows 7 Beta machines from Sharrk007&#039;s Win 7 Codecs Page:

   http://shark007.net/win7codecs.html

Not only did they install and work with Windows Media Player - they were essential - far better for many codec types than the codecs that shipped with W7 Beta - especially on my under powered laptop with an under powered graphics card with drivers that were never updated to support Vista, let alone W7.

...Dale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I installed win7codecs on my Windows 7 Beta machines from Sharrk007&#8217;s Win 7 Codecs Page:</p>
<p>   <a href="http://shark007.net/win7codecs.html" rel="nofollow">http://shark007.net/win7codecs.html</a></p>
<p>Not only did they install and work with Windows Media Player &#8211; they were essential &#8211; far better for many codec types than the codecs that shipped with W7 Beta &#8211; especially on my under powered laptop with an under powered graphics card with drivers that were never updated to support Vista, let alone W7.</p>
<p>&#8230;Dale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-03/new-windows-7-codec-support-rumblings/comment-page-1/#comment-87093</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/?p=8640#comment-87093</guid>
		<description>there have been a handful of &quot;releases&quot; around and so far i&#039;ve stuck with the 7000 build, it would be a real nightmare if this is true in future microsoft released updates. i&#039;m still wondering how, or if, they&#039;ll cater to those upgrading from beta to RC or final. most likely just reformat/install.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there have been a handful of &#8220;releases&#8221; around and so far i&#8217;ve stuck with the 7000 build, it would be a real nightmare if this is true in future microsoft released updates. i&#8217;m still wondering how, or if, they&#8217;ll cater to those upgrading from beta to RC or final. most likely just reformat/install.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

