<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ZNF ‘Round The Web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-01/znf-%e2%80%98round-the-web-6/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-01/znf-%e2%80%98round-the-web-6/</link>
	<description>All your digital media goodness.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 07:34:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: xdreamwalker</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-01/znf-%e2%80%98round-the-web-6/comment-page-1/#comment-85583</link>
		<dc:creator>xdreamwalker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/?p=7049#comment-85583</guid>
		<description>I currently use a Toshiba HD-A2 player as my primary DVD player. Yes, I still have a good collection of HD DVDs in the house. I don&#039;t plan on getting rid of them because they still work and I&#039;m not going to purchase my movies again.
I do own a PS3 and am very happy with it. When we were looking for a Blu-ray player it was the least expensive one available. Not only is it a Blu-ray player, but I can play my GTA4 on it as well. I&#039;ve never had a problem with it and it seems to load in a decent amount of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I currently use a Toshiba HD-A2 player as my primary DVD player. Yes, I still have a good collection of HD DVDs in the house. I don&#8217;t plan on getting rid of them because they still work and I&#8217;m not going to purchase my movies again.<br />
I do own a PS3 and am very happy with it. When we were looking for a Blu-ray player it was the least expensive one available. Not only is it a Blu-ray player, but I can play my GTA4 on it as well. I&#8217;ve never had a problem with it and it seems to load in a decent amount of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Drawbaugh</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-01/znf-%e2%80%98round-the-web-6/comment-page-1/#comment-85581</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Drawbaugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/?p=7049#comment-85581</guid>
		<description>The LG BD300 is a better player than the Samsung or PS3. 

It sells for about $300, which is 25% less than the PS3.
It has discrete IR commands for on and off, neither the other two do. 
The BD300 loads discs faster -- I&#039;ve not confirmed this myself.
It will bitstream all the codecs, which the PS3 can&#039;t do.

The only advantage the BD-P2500 has over the BD300 is upscaling, but with most BDs encoded at 1080p24 this is only useful if you watch a lot of DVDs, I don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The LG BD300 is a better player than the Samsung or PS3. </p>
<p>It sells for about $300, which is 25% less than the PS3.<br />
It has discrete IR commands for on and off, neither the other two do.<br />
The BD300 loads discs faster &#8212; I&#8217;ve not confirmed this myself.<br />
It will bitstream all the codecs, which the PS3 can&#8217;t do.</p>
<p>The only advantage the BD-P2500 has over the BD300 is upscaling, but with most BDs encoded at 1080p24 this is only useful if you watch a lot of DVDs, I don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davis Freeberg</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-01/znf-%e2%80%98round-the-web-6/comment-page-1/#comment-85580</link>
		<dc:creator>Davis Freeberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/?p=7049#comment-85580</guid>
		<description>$5 for a newspaper sounds like a ridonculous amount to pay for a little ink.  No wonder they&#039;re not selling papers.  Most of the daily papers in the bay area are priced at 75 cents, but I think it&#039;s a buck fifty on Sundays.  I like reading the paper while I drink coffee in the morning, but subscribing seems like too much of a hassle.  Not only is it one more unnecessary expense, but after a couple of weeks, the old papers start piling up.  It&#039;d be a shame if we don&#039;t have actual newspapers one day, but if I had to choose between having paper or the net, it wouldn&#039;t even be a contest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$5 for a newspaper sounds like a ridonculous amount to pay for a little ink.  No wonder they&#8217;re not selling papers.  Most of the daily papers in the bay area are priced at 75 cents, but I think it&#8217;s a buck fifty on Sundays.  I like reading the paper while I drink coffee in the morning, but subscribing seems like too much of a hassle.  Not only is it one more unnecessary expense, but after a couple of weeks, the old papers start piling up.  It&#8217;d be a shame if we don&#8217;t have actual newspapers one day, but if I had to choose between having paper or the net, it wouldn&#8217;t even be a contest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Zatz</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-01/znf-%e2%80%98round-the-web-6/comment-page-1/#comment-85579</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Zatz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/?p=7049#comment-85579</guid>
		<description>As it turns out the Washington Post deal came with a phone number to call. Which isn&#039;t how I operate. When visiting their web site, I got a better deal: 26 weeks of Sunday paper/delivery for a mere $0.49/wk. It&#039;s worth that just to have someone else climbing the four flights of stairs. Wonder if this is a promotional rate which will increase? Hm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As it turns out the Washington Post deal came with a phone number to call. Which isn&#8217;t how I operate. When visiting their web site, I got a better deal: 26 weeks of Sunday paper/delivery for a mere $0.49/wk. It&#8217;s worth that just to have someone else climbing the four flights of stairs. Wonder if this is a promotional rate which will increase? Hm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

