<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo&#8217;s Internet TV Widget Platform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-01/yahoos-internet-tv-widget-platform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-01/yahoos-internet-tv-widget-platform/</link>
	<description>All your digital media goodness.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:57:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-01/yahoos-internet-tv-widget-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-85625</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 00:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/?p=6956#comment-85625</guid>
		<description>I bet Vizio&#039;s will be a lower price! and I can&#039;t wait to see them out</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet Vizio&#8217;s will be a lower price! and I can&#8217;t wait to see them out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-01/yahoos-internet-tv-widget-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-85529</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 08:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/?p=6956#comment-85529</guid>
		<description>Yahoo Widgets has major memory leaks on the PC desktop. If they are using the same platform for the TV, I&#039;m worried that these widgets are going to crash my TV. Perhaps they feel that people don&#039;t keep their TVs on for significant lengths of time so that the increasing memory usage bugs in Yahoo Widgets are not a problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo Widgets has major memory leaks on the PC desktop. If they are using the same platform for the TV, I&#8217;m worried that these widgets are going to crash my TV. Perhaps they feel that people don&#8217;t keep their TVs on for significant lengths of time so that the increasing memory usage bugs in Yahoo Widgets are not a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Zatz</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-01/yahoos-internet-tv-widget-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-85526</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Zatz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 01:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/?p=6956#comment-85526</guid>
		<description>As long as it&#039;s built into boxes we already have or boxes we want (like a Blu-ray player or cable box, as you say), it&#039;s fine. But enough of these dedicated Vudu-esque boxes.

By the way, I also swung by Intel&#039;s booth and spoke to Glenn Cochran of the Digital Home Group - shot some pics. Will have to hit that at some point as well, including their reference design for a tru2way cable DVR (which was branded Samsung, as well as some unbranded stuff and models destined for or deployed in Europe).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as it&#8217;s built into boxes we already have or boxes we want (like a Blu-ray player or cable box, as you say), it&#8217;s fine. But enough of these dedicated Vudu-esque boxes.</p>
<p>By the way, I also swung by Intel&#8217;s booth and spoke to Glenn Cochran of the Digital Home Group &#8211; shot some pics. Will have to hit that at some point as well, including their reference design for a tru2way cable DVR (which was branded Samsung, as well as some unbranded stuff and models destined for or deployed in Europe).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Vandalay</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-01/yahoos-internet-tv-widget-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-85525</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Vandalay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 01:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/?p=6956#comment-85525</guid>
		<description>This internet/tv convergence is going to found in &#039;set top boxes&#039; much more often than built directly into a tv.  So you wouldn&#039;t need a new or special HDTV for the product.
Future blu-ray players, cable boxes, tivo/dvr boxes etc will have this tech incorporated. (this is basically what intel showed off)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This internet/tv convergence is going to found in &#8217;set top boxes&#8217; much more often than built directly into a tv.  So you wouldn&#8217;t need a new or special HDTV for the product.<br />
Future blu-ray players, cable boxes, tivo/dvr boxes etc will have this tech incorporated. (this is basically what intel showed off)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John G</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-01/yahoos-internet-tv-widget-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-85522</link>
		<dc:creator>John G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/?p=6956#comment-85522</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll keep my Tivo!  - Yahoo - thanks though for thinking of this, but I just purchased a new TV, it&#039;s going to be a while before I would even consider this feature as something I would need.  I&#039;ll have it on my Tivo long before I would buy a new TV.

John G.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll keep my Tivo!  &#8211; Yahoo &#8211; thanks though for thinking of this, but I just purchased a new TV, it&#8217;s going to be a while before I would even consider this feature as something I would need.  I&#8217;ll have it on my Tivo long before I would buy a new TV.</p>
<p>John G.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hogues</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-01/yahoos-internet-tv-widget-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-85521</link>
		<dc:creator>Hogues</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/?p=6956#comment-85521</guid>
		<description>If you could squeeze a PVR into a tru2way tv with internet video, that would truly be boxless nirvana.  I can&#039;t wait.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you could squeeze a PVR into a tru2way tv with internet video, that would truly be boxless nirvana.  I can&#8217;t wait.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Zatz</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-01/yahoos-internet-tv-widget-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-85520</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Zatz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/?p=6956#comment-85520</guid>
		<description>Todd, xdreamwalker is correct. Without an Internet-connected television you don&#039;t have many options to run this. It may be possible some existing or older TVs could receive firmware updates, but in terms of manufacturers allocating resources I bet most will want you to buy new TVs. Yahoo and Intel have also demo-ed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/16/intel-promises-widget-lovin-internet-tv-set-top-boxes-at-ces/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a little prototype (?) box&lt;/a&gt;. I suppose that could be offered as a retail accessory to &quot;retrofit&quot; existing television, but I&#039;m not sure if it&#039;s headed to market (and by whom).

I&#039;m pretty fired up, but the well rounded Vizio model (802.11n, Netflix, QWERTY remote) isn&#039;t schedule to drop until this summer. I&#039;m hoping a unified platform like this accelerates Internet video into the living room. And can you imagine a tru2way HDTV with this? It could be boxless Nirvana...

Interestingly, the consolidated Yahoo Connected Home unit also &lt;a href=&quot;http://connectedtv.yahoo.com/partners/tivo&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;displays the Y! TiVo HME apps&lt;/a&gt;. Although this new widget engine/bar would be so much better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todd, xdreamwalker is correct. Without an Internet-connected television you don&#8217;t have many options to run this. It may be possible some existing or older TVs could receive firmware updates, but in terms of manufacturers allocating resources I bet most will want you to buy new TVs. Yahoo and Intel have also demo-ed <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/16/intel-promises-widget-lovin-internet-tv-set-top-boxes-at-ces/" rel="nofollow">a little prototype (?) box</a>. I suppose that could be offered as a retail accessory to &#8220;retrofit&#8221; existing television, but I&#8217;m not sure if it&#8217;s headed to market (and by whom).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty fired up, but the well rounded Vizio model (802.11n, Netflix, QWERTY remote) isn&#8217;t schedule to drop until this summer. I&#8217;m hoping a unified platform like this accelerates Internet video into the living room. And can you imagine a tru2way HDTV with this? It could be boxless Nirvana&#8230;</p>
<p>Interestingly, the consolidated Yahoo Connected Home unit also <a href="http://connectedtv.yahoo.com/partners/tivo" rel="nofollow">displays the Y! TiVo HME apps</a>. Although this new widget engine/bar would be so much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xdreamwalker</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-01/yahoos-internet-tv-widget-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-85519</link>
		<dc:creator>xdreamwalker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/?p=6956#comment-85519</guid>
		<description>@Todd, if you did not have an internet connected TV, like me, then you would need some sort of hardware box. For me, that box is a computer, but this solution takes out the need for another STB.
To me this sure does look nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Todd, if you did not have an internet connected TV, like me, then you would need some sort of hardware box. For me, that box is a computer, but this solution takes out the need for another STB.<br />
To me this sure does look nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

