<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New Remotes of CES</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-01/the-new-remotes-of-ces/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-01/the-new-remotes-of-ces/</link>
	<description>All your digital media goodness.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 03:05:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-01/the-new-remotes-of-ces/comment-page-1/#comment-85611</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 20:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/?p=6658#comment-85611</guid>
		<description>That Vizio remote looks crazy cool.  Full on keyboard nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Vizio remote looks crazy cool.  Full on keyboard nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Zatz</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-01/the-new-remotes-of-ces/comment-page-1/#comment-85336</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Zatz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 23:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/?p=6658#comment-85336</guid>
		<description>Doh, I knew that. Thanks for the correct/addition, just fixed the post. Over tired and blogging at 5AM probably means a higher percentage of errors. Regarding the One, one of the complaints amongst the geekier crowd is that it doesn&#039;t have the z-wave capabilities of the 890. Not sure how much sales that drives (or prevents) though. At one point, I owned two 880s but I&#039;ve really simplified my setup lately. When I&#039;m back on IR controlled lighting, I&#039;ll revisit. And I always wanted remote control curtains/blinds as well. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doh, I knew that. Thanks for the correct/addition, just fixed the post. Over tired and blogging at 5AM probably means a higher percentage of errors. Regarding the One, one of the complaints amongst the geekier crowd is that it doesn&#8217;t have the z-wave capabilities of the 890. Not sure how much sales that drives (or prevents) though. At one point, I owned two 880s but I&#8217;ve really simplified my setup lately. When I&#8217;m back on IR controlled lighting, I&#8217;ll revisit. And I always wanted remote control curtains/blinds as well. <img src='http://www.zatznotfunny.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike U</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-01/the-new-remotes-of-ces/comment-page-1/#comment-85326</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike U</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 18:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/?p=6658#comment-85326</guid>
		<description>Dave, the harmony one is pretty much a replacement for the Harmony 880. I upgraded to this from the 880 in the middle of last year. The control layout is a 100% better than on the 880. Still nothing really dramatic or unique about it outside of the typical harmony features.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, the harmony one is pretty much a replacement for the Harmony 880. I upgraded to this from the 880 in the middle of last year. The control layout is a 100% better than on the 880. Still nothing really dramatic or unique about it outside of the typical harmony features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Zatz</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-01/the-new-remotes-of-ces/comment-page-1/#comment-85325</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Zatz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/?p=6658#comment-85325</guid>
		<description>I believe that remote is RF. Hopefully the DVR hardware will also work with IR and the traditional DISH remotes or universals like your Harmony.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that remote is RF. Hopefully the DVR hardware will also work with IR and the traditional DISH remotes or universals like your Harmony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Roat</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-01/the-new-remotes-of-ces/comment-page-1/#comment-85323</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Roat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/?p=6658#comment-85323</guid>
		<description>That Dish remote looks like something I&#039;d hate to use;  I already use an expensive and complex Harmony.  Can I opt out of that Dish remote for a savings off the cost of the receiver?!?

Maybe it&#039;ll just be an optional upgrade.  Can you imagine explaining that thing to Grandma?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Dish remote looks like something I&#8217;d hate to use;  I already use an expensive and complex Harmony.  Can I opt out of that Dish remote for a savings off the cost of the receiver?!?</p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;ll just be an optional upgrade.  Can you imagine explaining that thing to Grandma?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davis Freeberg</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-01/the-new-remotes-of-ces/comment-page-1/#comment-85320</link>
		<dc:creator>Davis Freeberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 16:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/?p=6658#comment-85320</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a fan of the wii-mote concept myself.  I think once we see them in enough homes, that we&#039;ll see a TV version of the net start to come out.  Instead of relying on text, it will all be based on what you could do with a mouse.  Eventually, I&#039;d like to be able to access content no matter where it comes from without having to get off the couch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a fan of the wii-mote concept myself.  I think once we see them in enough homes, that we&#8217;ll see a TV version of the net start to come out.  Instead of relying on text, it will all be based on what you could do with a mouse.  Eventually, I&#8217;d like to be able to access content no matter where it comes from without having to get off the couch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

