<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Boxee, Finally Living Up To Square Name?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-01/boxee-finally-living-up-to-square-name/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-01/boxee-finally-living-up-to-square-name/</link>
	<description>All your digital media goodness.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:21:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave Zatz</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-01/boxee-finally-living-up-to-square-name/comment-page-1/#comment-85648</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Zatz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 04:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/?p=7055#comment-85648</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;d read the post, you might have seen the AppleTV mention - and that the hardware is underpowered, incapable of handling Netflix via Boxee. I&#039;ve spoken to their team about this on a few occasions. However, I suspect you&#039;re just here pimping a web site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;d read the post, you might have seen the AppleTV mention &#8211; and that the hardware is underpowered, incapable of handling Netflix via Boxee. I&#8217;ve spoken to their team about this on a few occasions. However, I suspect you&#8217;re just here pimping a web site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Victory</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-01/boxee-finally-living-up-to-square-name/comment-page-1/#comment-85647</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Victory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 04:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/?p=7055#comment-85647</guid>
		<description>Boxee already has a set top box. It&#039;s called Apple-TV. Instead of investing in a full blown PC/Mac I was able to order mine already pre-installed from ***.com in less than $300. Has all the right connectors and a remote. Took minutes to set up. I just wish they release the Netflix support for ATV already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boxee already has a set top box. It&#8217;s called Apple-TV. Instead of investing in a full blown PC/Mac I was able to order mine already pre-installed from ***.com in less than $300. Has all the right connectors and a remote. Took minutes to set up. I just wish they release the Netflix support for ATV already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Zatz</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-01/boxee-finally-living-up-to-square-name/comment-page-1/#comment-85616</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Zatz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/?p=7055#comment-85616</guid>
		<description>Ivan, I agree they probably couldn&#039;t work a deal directly. But if they move to DLNA/uPnP like PlayOn, they could do &lt;i&gt;something&lt;/i&gt;. But I remember in the old Dreamcast days loading up a web browser off disc. Wouldn&#039;t it be cool if one of these consoles gave a disc access to the network and various playback codecs. But you&#039;re right, it&#039;d never be approved. 

And I should add that while I&#039;ve questioned Boxee a bit the last few days I may not have done a good enough job conveying how much I dig what they&#039;re doing in aggregating all these sources. I also like where they&#039;re going visually - the Netflix UI is beautiful and I like how a relevant screenshot/background fills the screen when say browsing ABC Lost episodes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ivan, I agree they probably couldn&#8217;t work a deal directly. But if they move to DLNA/uPnP like PlayOn, they could do <i>something</i>. But I remember in the old Dreamcast days loading up a web browser off disc. Wouldn&#8217;t it be cool if one of these consoles gave a disc access to the network and various playback codecs. But you&#8217;re right, it&#8217;d never be approved. </p>
<p>And I should add that while I&#8217;ve questioned Boxee a bit the last few days I may not have done a good enough job conveying how much I dig what they&#8217;re doing in aggregating all these sources. I also like where they&#8217;re going visually &#8211; the Netflix UI is beautiful and I like how a relevant screenshot/background fills the screen when say browsing ABC Lost episodes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan Y</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-01/boxee-finally-living-up-to-square-name/comment-page-1/#comment-85615</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan Y</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/?p=7055#comment-85615</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if a game console will ever see Boxee integration, but if I were Sony, I&#039;d try to find some way to get Boxee on the box (doubtful that Microsoft would go for it).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if a game console will ever see Boxee integration, but if I were Sony, I&#8217;d try to find some way to get Boxee on the box (doubtful that Microsoft would go for it).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Zatz</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-01/boxee-finally-living-up-to-square-name/comment-page-1/#comment-85607</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Zatz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 19:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/?p=7055#comment-85607</guid>
		<description>Bruce, you raise an excellent point. (D-Link/DivX, box for reference.) And I can totally relate as a guy involved with the SlingCatcher at one point. Manufacturing and selling hardware is not a trivial or risk-free proposition. Which is why some of the survey elements are interesting - with talks of perhaps integrating Boxee functionality into an existing game console. Sort of extend Boxee like a PlayOn - but with dual interfaces?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce, you raise an excellent point. (D-Link/DivX, box for reference.) And I can totally relate as a guy involved with the SlingCatcher at one point. Manufacturing and selling hardware is not a trivial or risk-free proposition. Which is why some of the survey elements are interesting &#8211; with talks of perhaps integrating Boxee functionality into an existing game console. Sort of extend Boxee like a PlayOn &#8211; but with dual interfaces?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-01/boxee-finally-living-up-to-square-name/comment-page-1/#comment-85605</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/?p=7055#comment-85605</guid>
		<description>I have a somewhat different take, that boxee might be better off keeping their focus on software.  Having faced the challenge of marketing a media adapter type product, I know how difficult it can be to get people interested in what remains a very niche category.  I think as computers get smaller and quieter, more people may in fact become more interested in having one connected to their TVs.  With a decent remote, it&#039;s a far better user experience than I&#039;ve seen from any DMA, in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a somewhat different take, that boxee might be better off keeping their focus on software.  Having faced the challenge of marketing a media adapter type product, I know how difficult it can be to get people interested in what remains a very niche category.  I think as computers get smaller and quieter, more people may in fact become more interested in having one connected to their TVs.  With a decent remote, it&#8217;s a far better user experience than I&#8217;ve seen from any DMA, in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Zatz</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-01/boxee-finally-living-up-to-square-name/comment-page-1/#comment-85599</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Zatz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/?p=7055#comment-85599</guid>
		<description>Satellite support would be a bitch because the only way to access that HD content is via component outputs. Meaning they&#039;d need IR control of satellite set-top boxes. That content is locked down, not directly accessible. If you want to record satellite without using their DVRs, you&#039;re going to have to build your own thing - SageTV running Hauppauge&#039;s HD PVR and controlling the sat STB. Although, a PC like that will also play your M4V and MKV stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Satellite support would be a bitch because the only way to access that HD content is via component outputs. Meaning they&#8217;d need IR control of satellite set-top boxes. That content is locked down, not directly accessible. If you want to record satellite without using their DVRs, you&#8217;re going to have to build your own thing &#8211; SageTV running Hauppauge&#8217;s HD PVR and controlling the sat STB. Although, a PC like that will also play your M4V and MKV stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-01/boxee-finally-living-up-to-square-name/comment-page-1/#comment-85598</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/?p=7055#comment-85598</guid>
		<description>Shame - they left off my most important choice - Satellite support. They mention Cable Card, but that would be another TiVo - a product that doesn&#039;t work with DirecTV or Dish. For me, I _NEED_ an AppleTV that supports non M4V format video such as MKV High Profile etc. I&#039;d love one that can also record programming off a satellite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shame &#8211; they left off my most important choice &#8211; Satellite support. They mention Cable Card, but that would be another TiVo &#8211; a product that doesn&#8217;t work with DirecTV or Dish. For me, I _NEED_ an AppleTV that supports non M4V format video such as MKV High Profile etc. I&#8217;d love one that can also record programming off a satellite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

