<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bring on the Widgets!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2008-11/bring-on-the-widgets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2008-11/bring-on-the-widgets/</link>
	<description>All your digital media goodness.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 22:19:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2008-11/bring-on-the-widgets/comment-page-1/#comment-84234</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 22:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/?p=5783#comment-84234</guid>
		<description>cypherstream, Ive thought the same thing for the last 2+ years, but I havent heard of *1* company letting it happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cypherstream, Ive thought the same thing for the last 2+ years, but I havent heard of *1* company letting it happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cypherstream</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2008-11/bring-on-the-widgets/comment-page-1/#comment-84222</link>
		<dc:creator>cypherstream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/?p=5783#comment-84222</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d love to see some widgets in the ITV platforms for Motorola set top boxes.  I know Verizon has been on the forefront of innovation on set top software, but maybe if more people could develop set top applications in OCAP, more MSO&#039;s would be inspired to add features and functionality to their on screen interfaces.

With OCAP and Java TV API&#039;s, the development platform should be more open.  The middleware can be closed source so fear of &#039;hackers&#039; breaking down to lower levels to corrupt boxes to do bad things should be minimized.  With just a java sandbox UI layer, I think development should be opened up, much like it is for mobile devices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to see some widgets in the ITV platforms for Motorola set top boxes.  I know Verizon has been on the forefront of innovation on set top software, but maybe if more people could develop set top applications in OCAP, more MSO&#8217;s would be inspired to add features and functionality to their on screen interfaces.</p>
<p>With OCAP and Java TV API&#8217;s, the development platform should be more open.  The middleware can be closed source so fear of &#8216;hackers&#8217; breaking down to lower levels to corrupt boxes to do bad things should be minimized.  With just a java sandbox UI layer, I think development should be opened up, much like it is for mobile devices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mari Silbey</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2008-11/bring-on-the-widgets/comment-page-1/#comment-84216</link>
		<dc:creator>Mari Silbey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/?p=5783#comment-84216</guid>
		<description>@Todd All completely valid points. But worst case, you get a chance to win $25k.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Todd All completely valid points. But worst case, you get a chance to win $25k.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2008-11/bring-on-the-widgets/comment-page-1/#comment-84215</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/?p=5783#comment-84215</guid>
		<description>&quot;...Want to do a little app dev for a future Android phone?&quot;

If Moto would  OFFICIALLY state they are going to release an Android phone to the Consumer, available through the Moto store, unlocked, and not carrier neutral - Then &quot;yes&quot; I would.

I cheer that Moto is having a widget contest, by a suggestion would be:

If you want the same developer usage and adoption you see Apple&#039;s iPhone and T-Mobile&#039;s G1, you need to not operate in secret, keep us all guessing about mythical handsets that don&#039;t actually exist. Or worse, I develop a cool widget, only to see it high jacked or banned ( ala what Apple did to Podcaster ).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;Want to do a little app dev for a future Android phone?&#8221;</p>
<p>If Moto would  OFFICIALLY state they are going to release an Android phone to the Consumer, available through the Moto store, unlocked, and not carrier neutral &#8211; Then &#8220;yes&#8221; I would.</p>
<p>I cheer that Moto is having a widget contest, by a suggestion would be:</p>
<p>If you want the same developer usage and adoption you see Apple&#8217;s iPhone and T-Mobile&#8217;s G1, you need to not operate in secret, keep us all guessing about mythical handsets that don&#8217;t actually exist. Or worse, I develop a cool widget, only to see it high jacked or banned ( ala what Apple did to Podcaster ).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

