<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where&#8217;s the SDV Tuning Resolver?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2008-04/wheres-the-sdv-tuning-resolver/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2008-04/wheres-the-sdv-tuning-resolver/</link>
	<description>All your digital media goodness.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:13:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2008-04/wheres-the-sdv-tuning-resolver/comment-page-1/#comment-81914</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/?p=3480#comment-81914</guid>
		<description>Mot&#039;s has just cleared CableLabs, and Mari now says it is expected in Q4 (i.e. could be as late as Dec 31).  I&#039;ll note that this is a good six months after the promised Q208 that was originally discussed.  All of that &quot;wow, I can&#039;t believe they are doing this so fast&quot; stuff was just wishfull thinking obviously.  

If they don&#039;t roll it out instantly in massive volumes with all cable operators at once, I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if you can&#039;t get one for another six months or more after that date either...

This is sucking...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mot&#8217;s has just cleared CableLabs, and Mari now says it is expected in Q4 (i.e. could be as late as Dec 31).  I&#8217;ll note that this is a good six months after the promised Q208 that was originally discussed.  All of that &#8220;wow, I can&#8217;t believe they are doing this so fast&#8221; stuff was just wishfull thinking obviously.  </p>
<p>If they don&#8217;t roll it out instantly in massive volumes with all cable operators at once, I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if you can&#8217;t get one for another six months or more after that date either&#8230;</p>
<p>This is sucking&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hdtivo</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2008-04/wheres-the-sdv-tuning-resolver/comment-page-1/#comment-79320</link>
		<dc:creator>hdtivo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 14:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/?p=3480#comment-79320</guid>
		<description>... as for me, I am about ready to move on to publicly harrassing TiVo and others about the copy/transfer flag thing...  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; as for me, I am about ready to move on to publicly harrassing TiVo and others about the copy/transfer flag thing&#8230;  <img src='http://www.zatznotfunny.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hdtivo</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2008-04/wheres-the-sdv-tuning-resolver/comment-page-1/#comment-79319</link>
		<dc:creator>hdtivo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 14:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/?p=3480#comment-79319</guid>
		<description>Well, I suppose they could raise the cableCARD fee a bit.  ;)

BTW, I just added an &quot;Open Cable&quot; tag to blog posts going back to late 2006 in case people want to go over some historical thinking on the issue now that its a catchy topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I suppose they could raise the cableCARD fee a bit.  <img src='http://www.zatznotfunny.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>BTW, I just added an &#8220;Open Cable&#8221; tag to blog posts going back to late 2006 in case people want to go over some historical thinking on the issue now that its a catchy topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Zatz</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2008-04/wheres-the-sdv-tuning-resolver/comment-page-1/#comment-79317</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Zatz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 12:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/?p=3480#comment-79317</guid>
		<description>hdtivo, I&#039;ve also heard the Tuning Resolver will be provided &quot;free,&quot; bundled into/with any CableCARD lease fees. (My 3 CableCARDs incur no fees.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hdtivo, I&#8217;ve also heard the Tuning Resolver will be provided &#8220;free,&#8221; bundled into/with any CableCARD lease fees. (My 3 CableCARDs incur no fees.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MegaZone</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2008-04/wheres-the-sdv-tuning-resolver/comment-page-1/#comment-79315</link>
		<dc:creator>MegaZone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 07:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/?p=3480#comment-79315</guid>
		<description>Glenn, I responded to the comment you left at GL &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/18/cablecard-sdv-and-the-tuning-resolver/#comment-23644&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;over here.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glenn, I responded to the comment you left at GL <a href="http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/18/cablecard-sdv-and-the-tuning-resolver/#comment-23644" rel="nofollow">over here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hdtivo</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2008-04/wheres-the-sdv-tuning-resolver/comment-page-1/#comment-79314</link>
		<dc:creator>hdtivo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 04:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/?p=3480#comment-79314</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now if you look at all that has happend, its going to cost the cable cos. a lot to offer this TR.</p>
<p>It has been said the TR will be offered free of charge&#8230;but how solid that is I donīt know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hdtivo</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2008-04/wheres-the-sdv-tuning-resolver/comment-page-1/#comment-79313</link>
		<dc:creator>hdtivo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 03:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/?p=3480#comment-79313</guid>
		<description>... further the DVRs having two key issues...

1) until recently there being no way close to being able to make a DVR that recorded HD component or HDMI,

and

2) dual tuner being the current DVR standard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; further the DVRs having two key issues&#8230;</p>
<p>1) until recently there being no way close to being able to make a DVR that recorded HD component or HDMI,</p>
<p>and</p>
<p>2) dual tuner being the current DVR standard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hdtivo</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2008-04/wheres-the-sdv-tuning-resolver/comment-page-1/#comment-79312</link>
		<dc:creator>hdtivo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 03:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/?p=3480#comment-79312</guid>
		<description>My view quite a long time ago was that the whole one-way thing should have been halted, and &quot;buy-outs&quot; of the existing couple hundred thousand CC users arranged...which would have been chump change.

In conjunction, @$$ should have been kicked to get the two-way done.

All this would have been before there were more than a few thousand CC DVR owners. Its the DVR owners that are significant because this is really where the $$ investment is and where the STB is not the solution - the STB being essentially a tuning adapter for the last like 40yrs for TVs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My view quite a long time ago was that the whole one-way thing should have been halted, and &#8220;buy-outs&#8221; of the existing couple hundred thousand CC users arranged&#8230;which would have been chump change.</p>
<p>In conjunction, @$$ should have been kicked to get the two-way done.</p>
<p>All this would have been before there were more than a few thousand CC DVR owners. Its the DVR owners that are significant because this is really where the $$ investment is and where the STB is not the solution &#8211; the STB being essentially a tuning adapter for the last like 40yrs for TVs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

