<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Consumer Reports Validates Dave&#8217;s New HDTV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2007-10/consumer-reports-validates-daves-new-hdtv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2007-10/consumer-reports-validates-daves-new-hdtv/</link>
	<description>All your digital media goodness.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 03:05:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave Zatz</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2007-10/consumer-reports-validates-daves-new-hdtv/comment-page-1/#comment-74016</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Zatz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 17:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2007-10/consumer-reports-validates-daves-new-hdtv/#comment-74016</guid>
		<description>Yah, I do know they are sensitive in protecting their impartiality and go after companies who use their name/ratings in advertisements and such. But I figure Engadget and Gizmodo are bigger targets than I am, and they ran with it... Then again they probably also have larger legal defense funds. I don&#039;t know if there&#039;s a distinction between a photograph and a scan, but I figured a photo is more acceptable and limited it to the relevant bits. I also figure I&#039;m giving CR an endorsement by revealing I subscribe and value their reviews. However, if CR were to ask me to take down the photo, I would - I&#039;m not looking for any trouble or to make some sort of journalistic point. Though they&#039;d be the first org to ever request something come down...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yah, I do know they are sensitive in protecting their impartiality and go after companies who use their name/ratings in advertisements and such. But I figure Engadget and Gizmodo are bigger targets than I am, and they ran with it&#8230; Then again they probably also have larger legal defense funds. I don&#8217;t know if there&#8217;s a distinction between a photograph and a scan, but I figured a photo is more acceptable and limited it to the relevant bits. I also figure I&#8217;m giving CR an endorsement by revealing I subscribe and value their reviews. However, if CR were to ask me to take down the photo, I would &#8211; I&#8217;m not looking for any trouble or to make some sort of journalistic point. Though they&#8217;d be the first org to ever request something come down&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Purcell</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2007-10/consumer-reports-validates-daves-new-hdtv/comment-page-1/#comment-74015</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Purcell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 17:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2007-10/consumer-reports-validates-daves-new-hdtv/#comment-74015</guid>
		<description>Dave, you might want to be careful about the mention of CR and a picture of the magazine.  CR is hyper-sensitive about outside references of their reviews, and they have people who search online for things like this.  Normally, they&#039;re watching out for companies and stores, but blogs might be on their hit list as well.  I&#039;m definitely not an expert on what&#039;s appropriate or not in this type of  instance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, you might want to be careful about the mention of CR and a picture of the magazine.  CR is hyper-sensitive about outside references of their reviews, and they have people who search online for things like this.  Normally, they&#8217;re watching out for companies and stores, but blogs might be on their hit list as well.  I&#8217;m definitely not an expert on what&#8217;s appropriate or not in this type of  instance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Zatz</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2007-10/consumer-reports-validates-daves-new-hdtv/comment-page-1/#comment-74003</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Zatz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 12:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2007-10/consumer-reports-validates-daves-new-hdtv/#comment-74003</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s the Panasonic plasma which ends *77U (also seen in the picture). They had some massive price drops on the models CR reports on, so there may be a refresh coming or maybe it&#039;s already here? Once I made my purchase, I stopped looking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the Panasonic plasma which ends *77U (also seen in the picture). They had some massive price drops on the models CR reports on, so there may be a refresh coming or maybe it&#8217;s already here? Once I made my purchase, I stopped looking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Toeman</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2007-10/consumer-reports-validates-daves-new-hdtv/comment-page-1/#comment-73999</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Toeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 03:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2007-10/consumer-reports-validates-daves-new-hdtv/#comment-73999</guid>
		<description>Gah, can&#039;t ya put the model# in there Dave?  :)

I&#039;m looking for something new at 42&quot; myself, may go this way.  Then I can be more like you!  :0 :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gah, can&#8217;t ya put the model# in there Dave?  <img src='http://www.zatznotfunny.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking for something new at 42&#8243; myself, may go this way.  Then I can be more like you!  :0 <img src='http://www.zatznotfunny.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2007-10/consumer-reports-validates-daves-new-hdtv/comment-page-1/#comment-73990</link>
		<dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 19:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2007-10/consumer-reports-validates-daves-new-hdtv/#comment-73990</guid>
		<description>i got a 32&quot; samsung 720p lcd last weekend, and my gf&#039;s parents got a 40&quot; samsung 1080p lcd the same night. i think i inspired them? my 32 is now my bedroom tv, but i love it so far. the QAM tuner will certainly hold me over until i pony up for a s3 tivo for it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i got a 32&#8243; samsung 720p lcd last weekend, and my gf&#8217;s parents got a 40&#8243; samsung 1080p lcd the same night. i think i inspired them? my 32 is now my bedroom tv, but i love it so far. the QAM tuner will certainly hold me over until i pony up for a s3 tivo for it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Drawbaugh</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2007-10/consumer-reports-validates-daves-new-hdtv/comment-page-1/#comment-73987</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Drawbaugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 18:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2007-10/consumer-reports-validates-daves-new-hdtv/#comment-73987</guid>
		<description>Of course.
I&#039;d agree that the Panasonic is the best they ever tested and I&#039;m sure Pioneer is mad that they didn&#039;t test the only TV that would beat it. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course.<br />
I&#8217;d agree that the Panasonic is the best they ever tested and I&#8217;m sure Pioneer is mad that they didn&#8217;t test the only TV that would beat it. <img src='http://www.zatznotfunny.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Zatz</title>
		<link>http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2007-10/consumer-reports-validates-daves-new-hdtv/comment-page-1/#comment-73984</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Zatz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 17:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2007-10/consumer-reports-validates-daves-new-hdtv/#comment-73984</guid>
		<description>I assume Ben (of EngadgetHD) will chime in at some point... ;) No, they didn&#039;t appear to cover Pioneer&#039;s Kuro line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume Ben (of EngadgetHD) will chime in at some point&#8230; <img src='http://www.zatznotfunny.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  No, they didn&#8217;t appear to cover Pioneer&#8217;s Kuro line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

